Law
Office of Raymond Arabasz
884 South
Street
Bridgewater,
Ma 02324
508-697-3800
Fax
– 508-697-3811
Dear
Attorney Arabasz, November
8, 2012
RE:
Bonetzky-Joseph v Joseph
Docket
No: PL06 D0566-DV1
I
am writing to you to once again to notify you of my attempt to call my children
at 7pm last night, Wed November 7th with no success. I corresponded with you twice already in good
faith imploring for your assistance in solving this one issue at hand
regarding the calls only to be met with animosity which resolves nothing. This
is about the children after all?!
I
read your letter you mailed November 1, 2012 (received on November 6, 2012)
talking about how the children will not be available for my call on October 31,
2012. I appreciate your cooperation by
sending this notification six days late.
It is evident by your letter’s content you are continually placing
obstacles in the way which by its nature condones the misconduct of not allowing
the children to speak with their mother.
I
am a mother who has been greatly deprived of any normal mother daughter bonding
and grieves over the loss of the relationship with her children. All I want to do is love my children,
Alexandria, Shannon and Kelly, and at the very least speak with them. I have
called my children as agreed and yet my calls continue to be BLOCKED as
recorded, witnessed, and evidenced.
Acting
as Mr. Joseph’s attorney, you, Attorney Arabasz supplied the numbers I for
which I called. Why are you supplying me phone numbers that have placed
restrictions? I expect you will promptly provide me a working unrestricted phone
number where I can finally call my children unhampered and uncensored. This is not
a new request.
According to Verizon, apparently someone
has added these calling restrictions and/or blocks. Please explain who has
placed calling restrictions to prevent my calls to the numbers you supplied?
Why are my children continuing to be abused? I am extremely disappointed in this gross
misconduct and unbecoming behavior and fitness of a parent despite multiple
court orders that your clients repeatedly fails to comply with. I am distraught over how this conduct is
affecting my children.
Again,
I have repeatedly requested for an alternative number to call
my children for which you repeatedly failed to reply to
that request. I have also suggested my children be able to call me at 7pm on
Wednesdays as another solution with NO reply to that request
either.
I will
be calling my children this evening in hopes you have convinced your client to
be cooperative in this matter. So please advise your client I will be
attempting again and to have my children available for my call.
I
anticipate full cooperation from you, your client and his wife for the best
interests of the children not by words but actions by allowing them to correspond
with their mother and the maternal side of the family.
Your
client’s conduct is very troubling and concerning and I am worried that the
children are being harmed by the continuation to deny them complete access of
any means of communication with their mother or anyone on the maternal side of
the family for that matter. These destructive malicious acts by your client and
their continuation of them will only cause serious long term emotional
and psychological harm to the children.
I
would hate to think you are contributing to obstructing the well-being of my
children. It is unethical for you, Attorney Arabasz, to impede with reunification of a mother
daughter relationship as ordered and to insinuate anything else is grotesque.
Each
minute … each hour … each day … each week … each month … each year that goes by
not talking to their mother causes irreparable harm to the children.
What
are you going to do to remedy this problem so the children are made available
for my call? After three letters I have
sent to you, you have failed to answer this question.
The
solution is simple. Your client makes
the children available to correspond with their mother on Wednesdays. It is the right and honorable thing to do for
the children.
Thank
you for your anticipated cooperation,
Laura
Bonetzky-Joseph
(address confidential)
No comments:
Post a Comment